<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take 2 to Settle in Hot Coffee Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>GameStooge: Just another Game weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Game Stooge &#187; Take 2 Losses Shrink</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Stooge &#187; Take 2 Losses Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>[...] reported Take 2 takeover attempt were the losses being incurred by the company, as well as the Hot Coffee settlement. Well, according to Reuters, the company is still losing money, but not as much. Its net loss for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported Take 2 takeover attempt were the losses being incurred by the company, as well as the Hot Coffee settlement. Well, according to Reuters, the company is still losing money, but not as much. Its net loss for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Schommer</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Schommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/02/28/take-2-to-settle-in-hot-coffee-lawsuit/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I think Take-Two is getting owned in this one - they shouldn't need to do a damn thing.

Maybe it's just me, but games should be judged on the content that is playable on the game WITHOUT hacking. This mod doesn't work unless files are modified, because hackers found the changes and implemented them by enabling areas of code that were not intended on being enabled.

To me, the person that should be sitting in court is the hacker that found and released the mod - not the publishers that released a "clean" game (clean as far as GTA goes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Take-Two is getting owned in this one - they shouldn&#8217;t need to do a damn thing.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but games should be judged on the content that is playable on the game WITHOUT hacking. This mod doesn&#8217;t work unless files are modified, because hackers found the changes and implemented them by enabling areas of code that were not intended on being enabled.</p>
<p>To me, the person that should be sitting in court is the hacker that found and released the mod - not the publishers that released a &#8220;clean&#8221; game (clean as far as GTA goes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
