<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Folding@Home Is Free, Right?&#8230;.Not So Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/</link>
	<description>GameStooge: Just another Game weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: S Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>S Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it's $12 per month, amounting to approximately $150 per year. Regardless, the same argument applies to a PC running Folding@home. You're still using power (probably more with a PC). So, if you think there is little to show from Folding@home on a PS3, then you have to feel the same for Folding@home on a PC. 

The only difference is that the PS3 is more efficient with the power it uses since it's able to process more and therefore accomplish more for the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s $12 per month, amounting to approximately $150 per year. Regardless, the same argument applies to a PC running Folding@home. You&#8217;re still using power (probably more with a PC). So, if you think there is little to show from Folding@home on a PS3, then you have to feel the same for Folding@home on a PC. </p>
<p>The only difference is that the PS3 is more efficient with the power it uses since it&#8217;s able to process more and therefore accomplish more for the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>I think you meant $150 a year.

Monetary value?  Isn't this about curing diseases, or did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant $150 a year.</p>
<p>Monetary value?  Isn&#8217;t this about curing diseases, or did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Grimes</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>I don't know...that's almost $150 a month...with nothing to show for it.  Considering you can use the same application on the PC, which is already always on, it seems a bit much for something with little to no monetary value</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;that&#8217;s almost $150 a month&#8230;with nothing to show for it.  Considering you can use the same application on the PC, which is already always on, it seems a bit much for something with little to no monetary value</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>S Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamestooge.com/2007/03/28/foldinghome-is-free-rightnot-so-much/#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>I can't imagine running it for an entire month without turning it off. But if I did, $12 seems pretty reasonable. I really expected it to be much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine running it for an entire month without turning it off. But if I did, $12 seems pretty reasonable. I really expected it to be much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
